In message <32ecc9cd-d927-4407-914c-751316c59...@istaff.org>, John Curran write s: > On Feb 17, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote: > > >> 240/4 has been enabled in Linux since 2.6.25 (applied on January 21, > >> 2008 by David Miller) so that's like three years already. > > > > Yep, and that's great. Let me know when a Cisco 7600 will route a > > packet like this. > > So, it won't work for you. Is there any reason that it shouldn't > be defined as unicast or private use (with warnings) rather than > "Future Use", so that those who might have a use for it can do so? > > /John
Or to ask CISCO to fix the box so it can route it? In many cases it is a minimal change. I don't know whether it is in Cisco 7600 but it can't hurt to ask the vendors if it is technically possible. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
