On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:46 AM, George Bonser <gbon...@seven.com> wrote: >> If you want to go on a wild goose chase, start chasing down 240/4 and >> you might make some progress. >> >> As i have mentioned before, it was only after i gave up on 240/4 for >> private network numbering that i really earnestly took on IPv6-only as >> a strategy. Seeing 240/4 actually work would be nice, but i have >> already concluded it does not fit my exhaustion timeline given how >> many edge devices will never support it. >> >> If i have to fork lift, it should be for ipv6. > > 240/4 has been enabled in Linux since 2.6.25 (applied on January 21, > 2008 by David Miller) so that's like three years already. >
Yep, and that's great. Let me know when a Cisco 7600 will route a packet like this. Cameron
