On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Dobbins, Roland <rdobb...@arbor.net> wrote: > On Jan 13, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Jack Bates wrote: >> The proxy capabilities of the firewall are additional security >> measures on top of the NAT (and definitely should be >> deployed for their higher security value). > > Not in front of servers, they shouldn't - because they have a negative > security value in that context.
So all the folks who use reverse proxies like an http accellerator are wrong? -- William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
