Is that the FFA or the FAA?
On Jan 4, 2011, at 8:57 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote: > Can they simply extend the mandate? We need to setup new connectivity > to the FFA and was hoping to go IPv6 right out of the gate. > Cheers > Ryan > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Oberman [mailto:ober...@es.net] > Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 11:12 PM > To: Christopher Morrow > Cc: Ryan Finnesey; nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: FAA - ASDI servers > >> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 22:49:34 -0500 >> From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> >> >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Ryan Finnesey >> <ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com> wrote: >>> Very true but why the reference to vacuum tubes? >> >> sadly it was an FAA computer system joke. > > But, since the "F" stands for Federal, if it is still up in two years, > it must be reachable by IPv6. Today, the odds are pretty slim as almost > no federal systems are reachable by IPv6. It will be an interesting two > years for a lot of federal IT folks as the mandate is from the OMB who > can pull a budget for non-compliance. > -- > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer > Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) > Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) > E-mail: ober...@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 > Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 >
