On 12/14/10 2:38 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:39:07PM -0600, Aaron Wendel wrote:
> To what end? And who's calling the shots there these days? Comcast
> has been nothing but shady for the last couple years. Spoofing
> resets, The L3 issue, etc. What's the speculation on the end game?
I believe Comcast has made clear their position that they feel content
providers should be paying them for access to their customers.
The Internet would offer lesser value by allowing access providers to
hold their customers hostage. Clearly, such providers are not acting in
their customer's interests when inhibiting access to desired and
legitimate content. What is net neutrality expected to mean?
Providers should charge a fair price for bandwidth offered, not over
sell the bandwidth, and not constrain bandwidth below advertised rates.
Congestion pricing rewards bad practices that leads to the congestion.
-Doug
