About the same time the operators get back into the IETF and become involved again. There was a time when operators played a large role in the development of things BGP (e.g. Tony Bates, Enke Chen, both at iMCI).
No one is stopping us, the 'ivory tower' has no gate. jy On 28/08/2010, at 5:13 AM, Richard A Steenbergen <r...@e-gerbil.net> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 01:29:15PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: >> >> Unknown BGP attribute 99 (flags: 240) >> Unknown BGP attribute 99 (flags: 240) >> Unknown BGP attribute 99 (flags: 240) >> Unknown BGP attribute 99 (flags: 240) >> Unknown BGP attribute 99 (flags: 240) > > Just out of curiosity, at what point will we as operators rise up > against the ivory tower protocol designers at the IETF and demand that > they add a mechanism to not bring down the entire BGP session because of > a single malformed attribute? Did I miss the memo about the meeting? > I'll bring the punch and pie. > > -- > Richard A Steenbergen <r...@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras > GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) > >
