On 27 Aug 2010, at 20:03, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote: > On 27-08-10 20:41, Thomas Mangin wrote: >>> I think most of the impact was limited to Europe, especially Amsterdam area. >> Yes, It had an effect on ISPs which are connected to RIS. >> http://www.ripe.net/ris/ >> AFAIK this mean ASes at LINX and AMS-IX . The LINX graph shows a similar >> (but smaller) dip of 50-60 GB. > > Not only. We don't peer with RIS, but about 8-10 our peers announce to us > RIS. The nasty update we got from completely different AS, not RIS. > You may just check whether you see AS12654 - it is RIS.
Yes, the BGP message had a transitive attribute - sorry if I was not clear. That said, you may want to ask why you are getting RIS routes if you are not peering with them directly :p RIS is peering world wide ( http://www.ripe.net/ris/docs/peering.html ) but the mail was only sent to linx-ops and tech-l, so the announcement may have been limited to europe (for all I know). Thomas
