> In other words, if the ARIN board adopts a policy that legacy > registrants must install some of their addresses on a router on the > moon (or perhaps some requirement that's a little less extreme) then > failing to is cause for terminating the contract (14.b). Which revokes > the IP addresses (14.e.i).
Why be less extreme? I would rather see moon-routers! NANO's are encouraged to provide the datasheets for the Cisco 6509's solar-power module and wideband laser signaling SFPs. Best Regards, Nathan Eisenberg
