N3 = new network nodes, BIPP wasn't that great a name either.

The ASN was always 3561.

jy

On 12/08/2010, at 8:20 AM, Benson Schliesser <bens...@queuefull.net> wrote:

> 
> On 11 Aug 10, at 2:10 PM, Chris Boyd wrote:
> 
>> My recollection is that Worldcom bought out MFS.  UUnet was a later 
>> acquisition by the Worldcom monster (no, no biases here :-).  While this was 
>> going on MCI was building and running what was called the BIPP (Basic IP 
>> Platform) internally.  That product was at least reasonably successful, 
>> enough so that some gummint powers that be required divestiture of the BIPP 
>> from the company that would come out of the proposed acquisition of MCI by 
>> Worldcom.  The regulators felt that Worldcom would have too large a share of 
>> the North American Internet traffic.  The BIPP went with BT IIRC, and I 
>> think finally landed in Global Crossing's assets.
> 
> Actually, Cable & Wireless acquired the BIPP after regulators forced Worldcom 
> to divest one of their networks.  C&W developed a new network architecture as 
> an evolution of BIPP called "N3", based on MPLS as an ATM replacement for TE. 
>  (Perhaps somebody that worked at C&W back then can comment on N3; I can't 
> recall what it stood for.)  After a few years, C&W reorganized their American 
> operations into a separate entity, which subsequently went bankrupt.  Savvis 
> (my current employer) bought the assets out of bankruptcy court.  We then 
> upgraded the N3 network to support better QoS, higher capacity, etc, and call 
> it the "ATN" (Application Transport Network).  The current Savvis core 
> network, AS3561, is thus the evolved offspring of the MCI Internet Services / 
> Internet-MCI network.
> 
> Of course, before all of this, MCI built the network as a commercial Internet 
> platform in parallel to their ARPA network.  That's before my time, 
> unfortunately, so I don't know many details.  For instance I'm uncertain how 
> the ASN has changed over the years.  Anybody with more history and/or 
> corrections would be appreciated.
> 
> Cheers,
> -Benson
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to