On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:17 AM, <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> wrote: > On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 08:58:48 EDT, William Herrin said: > >> It takes some creative reading to think I claimed using an alternate >> but still correct address (e.g. supplied by mailboxes etc.) >> constituted fraud. Alternate != redacted. > > Right. The point is that by the same "what is the personal gain" standard, it > isn't obvious that redacted == fraud by definition.
What personal gain standard? I certainly didn't advocate one, and I don't find anything like that in ARIN's rules. As far as I can tell, anyone can pick an alternate postal address, a hotmail email address and a vonage phone number for their SWIP information if they so choose, quite regardless of whether any personal gain is involved. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
