On 6/9/2010 07:39, Jorge Amodio wrote: >> 1. Should ISPs be responsible for abuse from within their customer base? > > Not sure, ISPs role is just to move packets from A to B, you need to > clearly define what constitutes abuse and how much of it is considered > a crime. > > If I call your home every five minutes to harass you over the phone is > AT&T responsible ?
How does the question change with a "regulator" telling them they are? And does it matter if I refuse all calls from ATT because they don't? -- Somebody should have said: A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb contesting the vote. Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Eppure si rinfresca ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml