On 6/1/10 9:22 AM, Justin Wilson wrote: > He has since reversed that stance and they are working on IPV6 support, > at least that is what I read somewhere. I don¹t blame the guy really. If > people want a feature they should pony up a little money. Otherwise it is > free software with no implied support.
I feel that IPv6 should be a minimum requirement. At the time the author felt it should be an advanced paid-for feature. I treat commercial vendors the same way: no IPv6, no sale. That nastygram made me not want to donate (money or code) to IPplan. One shouldn't get into open source expecting money. The world moves forward and what is seen as a minimum requirement is eventually going to move with it. ~Seth
