On 26/05/10 19:55, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > On May 26, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Joe Abley wrote: >> On 2010-05-25, at 17:40, Martin List-Petersen wrote: >> >>> On 24/05/10 19:21, Thomas Magill wrote: >>>>> From the provider side, are most of you who are implementing IP6 >>>> peerings running BGP over IP4 and just using IP6 address families to >>>> exchange routes or doing IP6 peering? >>> >>> Most Internet Exchanges do not allow to mix on the same transport. So >>> IPv4 peering over IPv4 transport, IPv6 peering over IPv6 transport, you >>> can use the same interface though. >> >> Most Internet Exchanges don't care what BGP protocol options consenting >> neighbours decide to use, in my experience. (If they cared, what could they >> do?) > > Don't care? I think you mean "don't know". > > The exchange that starts snooping my BGP session to see what I am trading > with my peer is the exchange that will lose my business. >
Ok, let's clarify, what I was on about: I was talking about the peering sessions to the route-servers. What the IXP members do peering wise between themselves is hardly enforced. Kind regards, Martin List-Petersen -- Airwire - Ag Nascadh Pobail an Iarthair http://www.airwire.ie Phone: 091-865 968
