In message <01f57362-8092-48cb-8336-15b9cc171...@virtualized.org>, David Conrad writes: > On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Carl Rosevear wrote: > > I don't understand why anyone thinks NAT should be a fundamental part = > of the v6 internet=20 > > Perhaps the ability to change service providers without having to = > renumber?
We have that ability already. Doesn't require NAT. > Regards, > -drc -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
