On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Carl Rosevear wrote: > I don't understand why anyone thinks NAT should be a fundamental part of the > v6 internet
Perhaps the ability to change service providers without having to renumber? Regards, -drc
On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Carl Rosevear wrote: > I don't understand why anyone thinks NAT should be a fundamental part of the > v6 internet
Perhaps the ability to change service providers without having to renumber? Regards, -drc