On 2010.04.27 21:00, David Conrad wrote: > On Apr 27, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote: >> On Apr 27, 2010, at 8:42 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: >>> Windows will just populate the reverse zone as needed, if you let >>> it, using dynamic update. If you have properly deployed BCP 39 >>> and have anti-spoofing ingres filtering then you can just let any >>> address from the /48 add/remove PTR records. Other OS's will >>> follow suite. >> >> Is DDNS really considered to be the end-all answer for this? > > Seems it is that or not bothering with reverse anymore.
There are other solutions, which has become a major focus of mine based on some of the results I've gathered from my little test. About 50% (currently 50.59%) of all successful visits to my site do not have rDNS configured for their IPv6... That is a problem that needs a solution. The OP has a great question here. Steve
