On Apr 27, 2010, at 8:50 PM, Richard Barnes wrote: > Naïve question: If you used macro expansion, wouldn't you end up > providing responses for a lot of addresses that aren't in use? Maybe > that's not a problem?
Presumably the op would only use macros where needed, ie dynamically assigned addresses. So, for a pool of addresses assigned for DSL/Cable/FIOS subscribers, that pool would have forward/reverse set up. Note: I am definitely not up on my IPv6 knowledge, so there may be a Really Good Reason(tm) that one should not do this.. However, I was under the impression that having both forward and reverse for dynamic IPs was a best practice.. --------------------------- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold [email protected] --------------------------- "Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology." - Niven's Inverse of Clarke's Third Law
