> On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Joe Greco wrote: > >> On 19/04/2010 16:51, Florian Weimer wrote: > >>> I'm pretty sure the acceptance of NAT varies regionally. I think > >>> there's a large ISP in Italy which has been doing NAT since the 90s. > >> > >> to my knowledge, if we're talking about the same organisation, this large > >> ISP is moving away from NAT, or already has done so. > >> > >> Sure, you can NAT eyeballs, but it hurts like hell. > > > > Which hurts more ... NATting eyeballs, or blinding them entirely? > > > > Eventually we'll run out. Then we get to pick. > > IPv6 is not blinding them entirely.
No, IPv6 is clear vision. My _point_ was that NAT'ing eyeballs was better than providing no IPv4 gameplan (i.e. blind). ... JG -- Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net "We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN) With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.
