On 19/04/2010 16:14, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote: > The eyeball ISPs will find it trivial to NAT should they ever need to do > so [...]
Patrick, Having made this bold claim, have you ever actually tried to run a natted eyeball network? The last two natted eyeball networks I worked with could never figure out which aspect of NAT hurt more: the technical side or the business side. Nick
