On 4/19/10 9:14 AM, "Patrick Giagnocavo" <patr...@zill.net> wrote:
> The eyeball ISPs will find it trivial to NAT should they ever need to do > so however, something servers cannot do - you are looking at numbers, > not operational considerations. Personally, I'm just waiting to see which eyeball ISP is the first to react to looming IPv4 exhaustion by (NAT | IPv6 && 6to4)ing their client ranges and using the freed up /9 to offer colo/hosting services at very competitive (compared to desperately scrambling to find a /29 at your IPv4-exhausted ISP) pricing. -- Dave Pooser, ACSA Manager of Information Services Alford Media http://www.alfordmedia.com
