Kevin Oberman <ober...@es.net> wrote: > And, if you are using a 1988 TCP stack on a 4.3 system, you are not > likely to ever efficiently utilize a higher speed link
What higher speed link? I'm very happy with 384 kbps symmetric, using SDSL as ARPANET replacement. I have designed and built my own SDSL to EIA-530 CSU/DSU so I can use a Cisco 2500 router instead of that nasty new-fangled Netopia which has (oh horror!) RJ45 Ethernet instead of proper AUI. Oh, did I forget to mention that my Ethernet is coaxial? To me all that UTP stuff isn't true Ethernet. > and will not > behave well on any link. TCP has come a long way in the past 12 > years. (Of course, I can't guess what "mostly unchanged" means.) Backward compatibility rules! MS
