On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's right M.Fortaine .. and your model does not, as yet, appear to > address what you term as EDoS and what the general security community > calls "DDoS"
eh.. I guess I'm splitting hairs. the goal of 100k bots sending 1 query per second to a service that you know can only sustain 50k queries/second is.. not to economically Dos someone, it's to obliterate their service infrastructure. Sure, you could ALSO target something hosted (for instance) at Amazon-AWS and increase costs by making lots and lots and lots of queries, but that wasn't the point of what Deepak wrote, nor what i corrected. -chris > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Guillaume FORTAINE <gforta...@live.com> > wrote: >> From my point of view, it seems similar to the EDoS concept : >> >> http://www.rationalsurvivability.com/blog/?s=EDos >> >> "EDoS attacks, however, are death by a thousand cuts. EDoS can also utilize >> distributed attack sources as well as single entities, but works by making >> legitimate web requests at volumes that may appear to be “normal” but are >> done so to drive compute, network, and storage utility billings in a cloud >> model abnormally high." > > > > -- > Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.li...@gmail.com) >