> -----Original Message----- > From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:n...@foobar.org] > Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:56 PM > To: Tomas L. Byrnes > Cc: NANOG list > Subject: Re: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story? > > On 17/02/2010 20:51, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote: > > [Tomas L. Byrnes] We were a small regional ISP with only one main POP > at > > the time. > > off-net resolvers means that your continued customer satisfaction (and > therefore your continued reliable cash-flow) is completely dependent on > maintaining a good working relationship between your company and the > company which operates the resolvers. If - for whatever reason - they > decide to shut off services to your customers, your business will take > a > serious impact. > > Nick
[Tomas L. Byrnes] We had, and maintained, a good relationship, and the services were reciprocal. The resolvers were only tertiary anyway. YMMV, it worked for us. Different times.
