> > What were your educated observations, preferably with supporting data?
If it was capacity issues, they learned a hard lesson that you should have other CDNs available to shed traffic over to if yours hits a problem that can't be quickly solved in real time. If it was server/software/livestream technical , then /shrug. Fix those. :) On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 1:28 PM Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net> wrote: > Armchair quarterbacking... > > Discussions I've seen from operators on Facebook shows some that had PNIs > that worked just fine, while others with PNIs and cache boxes didn't fare > so well. Some with just cache boxes were fine, while others were not. > > What were your educated observations, preferably with supporting data? > > Did we have a problem with congestion where the cache boxes phones home > to, and this they just fell over? > > AWS used to be the data source of last resort. Did anyone notice > congestion going from AWS to cache boxes? > > > > > -----Mike HammettIntelligent Computing SolutionsMidwest Internet > ExchangeThe Brothers WISP >
