>
> What were your educated observations, preferably with supporting data?


If it was capacity issues, they learned a hard lesson that you should have
other CDNs available to shed traffic over to if yours hits a problem that
can't be quickly solved in real time.

If it was server/software/livestream technical , then /shrug. Fix those.
:)


On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 1:28 PM Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net> wrote:

> Armchair quarterbacking...
>
> Discussions I've seen from operators on Facebook shows some that had PNIs
> that worked just fine, while others with PNIs and cache boxes didn't fare
> so well. Some with just cache boxes were fine, while others were not.
>
> What were your educated observations, preferably with supporting data?
>
> Did we have a problem with congestion where the cache boxes phones home
> to, and this they just fell over?
>
> AWS used to be the data source of last resort. Did anyone notice
> congestion going from AWS to cache boxes?
>
>
>
>
> -----Mike HammettIntelligent Computing SolutionsMidwest Internet
> ExchangeThe Brothers WISP
>

Reply via email to