> If it's technically feasible to override or roll back transactions, you've violated one of the central tenets of block chain.
To be clear, I did not state such. Ownership can be transferred by smart contract. This does not violate a core tenet of blockchains and is a key feature of almost all blockchains which still exhibit signs of life. On Wednesday, November 13th, 2024 at 6:07 PM, William Herrin - bill at herrin.us <bill_at_herrin_us_grgdxp...@simplelogin.co> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 12:13 PM Jason R. Rokeach > jason-at-nanog.lb...@8shield.net wrote: > > > > Under block chain, an RIR would not be able to revoke number> resources, > > > not even for non-payment or fraud. > > > > For what it's worth, this is quite implementation specific and leaves a lot > > of room for intentional and appropriate design decisions. > > > Not really. If it's technically feasible to override or roll back > transactions, you've violated one of the central tenets of block > chain. You can design a system that allows transactions to be rolled > back or changed by a central authority but the result would not be a > block chain and would not have the desired characteristic of > resistance against government compulsion. > > Regards, > Bill Herrin > > > -- > William Herrin > b...@herrin.us > https://bill.herrin.us/
