> If it's technically feasible to override or roll back
transactions, you've violated one of the central tenets of block
chain.

To be clear, I did not state such. Ownership can be transferred by smart 
contract. This does not violate a core tenet of blockchains and is a key 
feature of almost all blockchains which still exhibit signs of life.


On Wednesday, November 13th, 2024 at 6:07 PM, William Herrin - bill at 
herrin.us <bill_at_herrin_us_grgdxp...@simplelogin.co> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 12:13 PM Jason R. Rokeach
> jason-at-nanog.lb...@8shield.net wrote:
> 
> > > Under block chain, an RIR would not be able to revoke number> resources, 
> > > not even for non-payment or fraud.
> > 
> > For what it's worth, this is quite implementation specific and leaves a lot 
> > of room for intentional and appropriate design decisions.
> 
> 
> Not really. If it's technically feasible to override or roll back
> transactions, you've violated one of the central tenets of block
> chain. You can design a system that allows transactions to be rolled
> back or changed by a central authority but the result would not be a
> block chain and would not have the desired characteristic of
> resistance against government compulsion.
> 
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
> 
> 
> --
> William Herrin
> b...@herrin.us
> https://bill.herrin.us/

Reply via email to