> Is there a competing droplist, that can be compared against Spamhaus's > droplist? That seems like an extraordinary claim, so I'm not satisfied > with the evidence provided. Is this not the best droplist?
Obviously the Spamhaus DROP list should be evaluated - you should not use such lists unreservedly. That said, the Spamhaus DROP list contains entries that *are* verifiably bad, e.g. the well published Cernel 85.255.112.0/20 prefix. Regarding the extraordinary claim - consider the possibility that Nanog has its share of kooks. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no
