Isn’t this sort of related to the AS-0 ROA effort a while back (except some of the RIRs rejected it, unfortunately)?
I suspect that the same reasons behind rejection of AS-0 will also apply to RIR implementation of something like this, so plans to address that (and revive AS-0 perhaps) might also be a worthy effort. Owen > On Oct 11, 2023, at 01:01, Martin Pels <martin+na...@rodecker.nl> wrote: > > Hi Job, > > I think this is important work. > > As you indicated in your mail you have spent quite some time compiling the > constraints files in the appendix. Keeping them up to date requires tracking > allocations and policy developments in all RIRs. It reminds me of bogon > filters for unallocated IP space, and the associated problems of networks not > updating them[0]. > > So while each RP should be able to make policy decisions based on its own > local criteria, managing a default set of constraints is something that is > best done centralized. Who do you envision should manage these lists? RP > software maintainers? RIRs? Others? > > [0] https://archive.nanog.org/meetings/nanog33/presentations/deitrich.pdf, > slide 4 > > Kind regards, > Martin
