> About 60% of the table is /24 routes. > Just going to /25 will probably double the table size.
or maybe just add 60%, not 100%. and it would take time. agree it would be quite painful. would rather not go there. sad to say, i suspect some degree of lengthening is inevitable. we have ourselves to blame; but blame does not move packets. randy, who was in the danvers cabal for the /19 agreement
