s/DMS/DFZ/ — Not sure how autocrrect did that without me noticing, apologies.
> On Sep 29, 2023, at 14:11, Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > > /32s are perfectly valid in the DMS, but there is currently an IETF limit of > ~500M of them (the other 3.5B are not yet released to the RIRs, only > 2000::/3). > > Owen > > >> On Sep 29, 2023, at 12:54, Collider <large.hadron.colli...@gmx.com> wrote: >> >> This thread is utter amateur hour. I too would rather /32s be valid in the >> DFZ - but they're not, for good reason (worstcase scenario = circa 4 bln. >> routing table entries - no BGP hwaccel can swing that!). >> >> >> Le 29 septembre 2023 19:51:29 UTC, Seth Mattinen via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> >> a écrit : >>> On 9/29/23 10:24, VOLKAN SALİH wrote: >>>> >>>> you guys become rich this way.. by playing penny pincher. >>>> >>>> I asked global firms like Huawei, not some local company called ADAMS! >>>> >>> >>> >>> You joined the wrong mailing list then. This is NANOG, which has companies >>> of all sizes and private individuals operating networks. This is not a >>> "global firms" mailing list. >>> >> >> -- >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >
