/32s are perfectly valid in the DMS, but there is currently an IETF limit of ~500M of them (the other 3.5B are not yet released to the RIRs, only 2000::/3).
Owen > On Sep 29, 2023, at 12:54, Collider <large.hadron.colli...@gmx.com> wrote: > > This thread is utter amateur hour. I too would rather /32s be valid in the > DFZ - but they're not, for good reason (worstcase scenario = circa 4 bln. > routing table entries - no BGP hwaccel can swing that!). > > > Le 29 septembre 2023 19:51:29 UTC, Seth Mattinen via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> > a écrit : >> On 9/29/23 10:24, VOLKAN SALİH wrote: >>> >>> you guys become rich this way.. by playing penny pincher. >>> >>> I asked global firms like Huawei, not some local company called ADAMS! >>> >> >> >> You joined the wrong mailing list then. This is NANOG, which has companies >> of all sizes and private individuals operating networks. This is not a >> "global firms" mailing list. >> > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
