> On Sep 28, 2023, at 22:29, Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 08:24, William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > >> Maybe. That's where my comment about CPU cache starvation comes into >> play. I haven't delved into the Juniper line cards recently so I could >> easily be wrong, but if the number of routes being actively used >> pushes past the CPU data cache, the cache miss rate will go way up and >> it'll start thrashing main memory. The net result is that the >> achievable PPS drops by at least an order of magnitude. > For that to be an issue, packets would need to be CPU switched which isn’t the case on the MX platform. Owen
- Re: maximum... VOLKAN SALİH
- Re: max... Tom Beecher
- Re: max... VOLKAN SALİH
- RE: max... Dominik Dobrowolski (dodobrow) via NANOG
- Re: max... Matthew Petach
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix lengt... William Herrin
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix ... Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp pre... William Herrin
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp... Saku Ytti
- Re: maximum ipv4... Tom Beecher
- Re: maximum ipv4... Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: maximum ipv4... William Herrin
- Re: maximum... Tom Beecher
- Re: max... William Herrin
- Re: max... Tom Beecher
- RE: max... Tony Wicks
- Re: max... William Herrin
- Re: max... Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: max... William Herrin
- Re: max... Tom Beecher
- Re: max... Owen DeLong via NANOG