CIDR and aggregation in the early 1990s was developed in response to AGS+ 
routers falling over under
the strain of the global size back then. Since then, IPv4 has been a 
progressive loosing proposition and
only gets worse every year. This proposal could certainly accelerate the rate 
at which it continues to get worse.


Owen


> On Sep 28, 2023, at 19:56, Joe Hamelin <neth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Wasn't it about 1997 or so when we ran into deployed Cisco gear (5500s back 
> then) running out of memory for BGP routes?  Been there, done that. -Joe
> 
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 7:41 PM Jon Lewis <jle...@lewis.org 
> <mailto:jle...@lewis.org>> wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Sep 2023, VOLKAN SALİH wrote:
>> 
>> > I believe, ISPs should also allow ipv4 prefixes with length between 
>> > /25-/27 instead of limiting maximum length to /24..
>> > 
>> > I also believe that RIRs and LIRs should allocate /27s which has 32 IPv4 
>> > address. considering IPv4 world is now mostly NAT'ed, 32 IPv4s are 
>> > sufficient for most of the
>> > small and medium sized organizations and also home office workers like 
>> > youtubers, and professional gamers and webmasters!
>> > 
>> > It is because BGP research and experiment networks can not get /24 due to 
>> > high IPv4 prices, but they have to get an IPv4 prefix to learn BGP in IPv4 
>> > world.
>> > 
>> > What do you think about this?
>> 
>> Not going to happen any time soon (if at all).
>> 
>> #show ip route summary | i Source|---|bgp
>>     Route Source                                Number Of Routes
>> ------------------------------------- -------------------------
>>     bgp                                                   925809
>> 
>> Think about how much network gear is out there that is straining under the 
>> current size of the global table.  Opening the flood gates to many more 
>> prefixes with /25-/27 routes in the global table would mean lots of gear 
>> needs to be upgraded/replaced sooner rather than later.
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>   Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
>>   StackPath, Sr. Neteng       |  therefore you are
>> _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
> 
> 
> -- 
> --
> Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474

Reply via email to