On Fri, 29 Sep 2023, VOLKAN SALİH wrote:
I believe, ISPs should also allow ipv4 prefixes with length between /25-/27
instead of limiting maximum length to /24..
I also believe that RIRs and LIRs should allocate /27s which has 32 IPv4
address. considering IPv4 world is now mostly NAT'ed, 32 IPv4s are sufficient
for most of the
small and medium sized organizations and also home office workers like
youtubers, and professional gamers and webmasters!
It is because BGP research and experiment networks can not get /24 due to high
IPv4 prices, but they have to get an IPv4 prefix to learn BGP in IPv4 world.
What do you think about this?
Not going to happen any time soon (if at all).
#show ip route summary | i Source|---|bgp
Route Source Number Of Routes
------------------------------------- -------------------------
bgp 925809
Think about how much network gear is out there that is straining under the
current size of the global table. Opening the flood gates to many more
prefixes with /25-/27 routes in the global table would mean lots of gear
needs to be upgraded/replaced sooner rather than later.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route
StackPath, Sr. Neteng | therefore you are
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
