Noe… You are conflating two completely different cases, sir.

CI submitted legitimate applications and their addresses were issued prior to 
Ernest’s activities.

You’re mixing Lu Heng up with Elad Cohen.

Owen


> On Sep 15, 2023, at 16:32, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> https://www.devdiscourse.com/article/international/1813989-the-strange-case-of-africas-stolen-ip-addresses
> 
> https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=Ernest+Byaruhanga+afrinic
> 
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 4:30 PM Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:eric.kuh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > AFRINIC legitimately issued those (closer to 6M) IP addresses to Cloud 
>> > Innovation based on justifications submitted. AFRINIC then attempted, 
>> > using claims that usage out of region is not permitted by the bylaws
>> (It is not prohibited by the bylaws, feel free to read them yourself), to 
>> reclaim those addresses.
>> 
>> This is not what happened. AFRINIC issued those IP addresses to Cloud 
>> Innovations based on fundamental misrepresentations by the applicant and 
>> internal fraudulent activity conducted by a single employee within AFRINIC. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 4:17 PM Delong.com <o...@delong.com 
>> <mailto:o...@delong.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 15, 2023, at 15:05, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com 
>>>> <mailto:eric.kuh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> A much better explanation of the situation can be found at:
>>>> 
>>>> https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/03/nrs_afrinic_review/
>>>> 
>>>> I also recommend that everyone who is not yet familiar with the issue 
>>>> google Lu Heng and Cloud Innovations, the Hong Kong based corporate entity 
>>>> in question which caused this.
>>> 
>>> Fair suggestion, but I wouldn’t say it’s fair to say Lu Heng or CI caused 
>>> this. I’d say that AFRINIC’s
>>> leadership at the time had an at least equal role in creating the problems 
>>> and in failing to address
>>> Them in a timely manner.
>>> 
>>> CI didn’t sue AFRINIC for nothing. AFRINIC, in violation of the actual text 
>>> of their bylaws attempted
>>> to revoke CI space and created major disruptions to a number of networks in 
>>> the process. Had CI
>>> not received the injunctions they got from the courts, likely the 
>>> disruption would have been much
>>> worse and caused some pretty wide-spread outages. 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=lu+heng+cloud+innovation
>>>> 
>>>> The short version of this is that a HK based corporate entity claims it is 
>>>> the legitimate "owner" of 7 million AFRINIC IPs.
>>> 
>>> AFRINIC legitimately issued those (closer to 6M) IP addresses to Cloud 
>>> Innovation based on justifications submitted. AFRINIC then attempted, using 
>>> claims that usage out of region is not permitted by the bylaws
>>> (It is not prohibited by the bylaws, feel free to read them yourself), to 
>>> reclaim those addresses.
>>> 
>>> AFRINIC whois and the courts have confirmed that Cloud Innovation is the 
>>> rightful registrant of those
>>> addresses at the time and as of now. Until a court rules otherwise (which 
>>> is very unlikely at this point),
>>> they don’t “own” the addresses, but they do “own” the rights to those 
>>> registrations in the AFRINIC
>>> database.
>>> 
>>> (Nobody “owns” any integers… Everyone remains equally free to use the 
>>> number 5 as much as they want.)
>>> 
>>> Owen
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 6:09 AM Bryan Fields <br...@bryanfields.net 
>>>> <mailto:br...@bryanfields.net>> wrote:
>>>>> On 9/13/23 9:27 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:
>>>>> > I think this qualifies as potentially operational.
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > Afrinic placed in receivership, board elections to be held in six 
>>>>> > months:
>>>>> > https://archive.ph/jOFE4
>>>>> 
>>>>> Looks like archive.ph <http://archive.ph/> is having problems.  This is 
>>>>> the original article.
>>>>> 
>>>>> > https://www.capacitymedia.com/article/2c6pnx4ymt7sd5c493wg0/news/exclusive-afrinic-placed-in-receivership-board-elections-to-be-held-in-six-months
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Bryan Fields
>>>>> 
>>>>> 727-409-1194 - Voice
>>>>> http://bryanfields.net <http://bryanfields.net/>
>>> 

Reply via email to