On 9/19/22 20:58, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
Why not publish such a table?
It shouldn’t be a particularly difficult task and could prove rather
enlightening.
Individual trial court cases aren't generally published. There may be a
transcript at the local courthouse, but rarely available in any kind of
online database.
Appellate court decisions are more widely published as they are often
cited as precedent in future cases. Even in those cases it may be
difficult to find a freely available copy. While the decisions are
public domain, they aren't widely distributed. Legal publishing houses
find and "annotate" them making the annotated decision subject to
copyright. These are then paywalled.
ARIN could certainly, if they chose, produce a listing of the cases to
which it was a party as well as those where ARIN counsel was called as
an expert witness. Actual access to the text of such cases would be left
as an exercise for the reader.
--
Jay Hennigan - j...@west.net
Network Engineering - CCIE #7880
503 897-8550 - WB6RDV
