USF money is about the bottom 1% not the top 1%.
I wouldn't be surprised if every Zuckerberg mansion worldwide has a
multi-gig connection to support his Metaverse.
The top 50% will continue to drive innovation (and bandwidth demand).
Broadband service providers claim no ROI to build-out (regardless of
technology) the tail of the long-tail (< 1%). Wireless/Satellite may
serve some rich & difficult to reach places, not hasn't help with poor &
difficult places.
If you (as a taxpayer/ratepayer) are giving out $50 to $200/month
broadband service provider incentives/subsidies, what is a reasonable
expection of the minimum (not "up to") service levels (100/20)?
