If you want to go down the BIND route, I'd recommend using xname as a frontend (http://source.xname.org/).
Paul E wrote: > cmaurand> Check out www.powerdns.com as an alternative to bind. Its > cmaurand> faster, more secure, does IPV6 and easier to maintain. > > This is purely opinion. > > BIND has warts, just as any large piece of code in wide spread use and > with lots of features will have. However, that's also one of its > advantages. Lots of folks run it and know it and fix it when it breaks. > > Works for root & gtld servers, must not totally suck. > > BIND does ipV6, has since BIND8. > > It is also fully DNSSEC compliant. Is powerdns yet? > > Yes. Do check out all the alternatives for DNS. But if you're looking at > ipV6 support because you want to be able to support upcoming protocols, > make sure your DNS can do DNSSEC correctly too. > > > >
