> On Jun 1, 2022, at 20:49 , Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> wrote: > > On 6/1/22 8:12 PM, Mitchell Tanenbaum via NANOG wrote: >> Believe it or not, there is cable within 500 yards, but they won’t extend >> it. (: > > > 50 feet across the street from me on the east side of the road is AT&T FTTH > territory. My side of the street is not. F the west side apparently. AT&T has fiber running through a sidewalk box in my next door neighbors yard. Said box has a 2” conduit directly to my MPOE in my garage. AT&T refuses to give me FTTH service or even business fiber at any price. They claim (for reasons passing understanding) that the buildout would exceed $100,000. All I can say is that if they pay their fiber crews that well, I should get a job pulling fiber for AT&T. Owen
- RE: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100... Matthew Huff
- RE: FCC proposes higher speed goals ... Mitchell Tanenbaum via NANOG
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed go... Aaron Wendel
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed go... John Schiel
- RE: FCC proposes higher spee... Mitchell Tanenbaum via NANOG
- Re: FCC proposes higher spee... Seth Mattinen
- Re: FCC proposes higher spee... Jared Mauch
- Re: FCC proposes higher spee... Sean Donelan
- Re: FCC proposes higher spee... Josh Luthman
- Re: FCC proposes higher spee... Joly MacFie
- Re: FCC proposes higher spee... Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100... Mike Hammett
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 M... Jeff Shultz
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100... t...@pelican.org
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals ... Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed go... Sean Donelan
- Re: FCC proposes higher spee... Masataka Ohta
- Re: FCC proposes higher spee... Dorn Hetzel
- Re: FCC proposes higher spee... Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: FCC proposes higher spee... Masataka Ohta
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100... Eric Kuhnke