> On Mar 24, 2022, at 21:18 , James R Cutler <james.cut...@consultant.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> On Mar 24, 2022, at 9:25 PM, Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org 
> <mailto:nanog@nanog.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> I think that we’re still OK on allocation policies. What I’d like to see is 
>> an end to the IPv4-think in large ISPs, such as Comcast’s continued micro 
>> allocations to their customers.
> 
> What exactly is your definition of “micro allocations”? Is a prefix/56 a 
> “micro allocation”? In over nine years of being an active forum participant 
> and customer of Comcast, I can not recall the usage of the term.

They’re issuing /60s (maximum) to residential customers.

And yes, a /56 is a micro allocation. /48 is the intended norm for IPv6 site 
assignments and is a perfectly reasonable prefix size for v6 delegation to a 
site.

Owen

Reply via email to