> On Mar 24, 2022, at 21:18 , James R Cutler <james.cut...@consultant.com> > wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2022, at 9:25 PM, Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org > <mailto:nanog@nanog.org>> wrote: >> >> I think that we’re still OK on allocation policies. What I’d like to see is >> an end to the IPv4-think in large ISPs, such as Comcast’s continued micro >> allocations to their customers. > > What exactly is your definition of “micro allocations”? Is a prefix/56 a > “micro allocation”? In over nine years of being an active forum participant > and customer of Comcast, I can not recall the usage of the term.
They’re issuing /60s (maximum) to residential customers. And yes, a /56 is a micro allocation. /48 is the intended norm for IPv6 site assignments and is a perfectly reasonable prefix size for v6 delegation to a site. Owen
