But the RIRs are the ones fielding requests for IPv4 space, and have some notion of how policy implementation might work in practice, so should have a lot of useful input.
On March 14, 2022 at 00:45 niels=na...@bakker.net (Niels Bakker) wrote: > * b...@theworld.com (b...@theworld.com) [Mon 14 Mar 2022, 00:31 CET]: > >Personally I'd rather hear from the RIRs regarding the value or not > >of making more IPv4 space such as 240/4 available. They're on the > >front lines of this. > > You've got your policy development process diagram upside down. The > community decides what the RIRs implement. They're not in touch with > merchant silicon manufacturers. > > > -- Niels. -- -Barry Shein Software Tool & Die | b...@theworld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*