There is a company First Orion that does some surveys and reports on such things: https://firstorion.com/2021-scam-call-trends/ *Brandon Svec*
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 1:58 PM Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote: > > On 2/20/22 9:56 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Mine exploded since the requirement date. Some mornings I get a dozen > before lunch. > > So our anecdotes don't agree :) I know, maybe we should find out somebody > who's doing research on this? > > Does anybody know how this is being tracked for real? > > Mike > > > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 2:33 PM Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote: > >> >> On 2/17/22 11:58 AM, Sean Donelan wrote: >> > >> > >> https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-finds-two-providers-failed-fully-implement-stirshaken-0 >> > >> > >> > The Federal Communications Commission today took action to ensure that >> > voice service providers meet their commitments and obligations to >> > implement STIR/SHAKEN standards to combat spoofed robocall scams. >> > Specifically, voice service providers Bandwidth and Vonage lost a >> > partial exemption from STIR/SHAKEN because they failed to meet >> > STIR/SHAKEN implementation commitments and have been referred to the >> > FCC’s Enforcement Bureau for further investigation. >> >> >> So for probably a year or so before the Stir/Shaken mandate came, I have >> been seeing a lot less phone spam. I don't know if that's typical but it >> was quite noticeable for me. What that tells me is that providers likely >> started clamping down on their shady customers well ahead of the mandate >> which says that regulatory fiat would have been sufficient too. But that >> hinges on whether my situation is typical though. >> >> Mike >> >>
