> On Dec 11, 2021, at 04:11 , Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> wrote:
>
> Andy Ringsmuth wrote on 11/12/2021 03:54:
>> The intricacies of Java are over my head, but I’ve been reading about this
>> Log4j issue that sounds pretty bad.
>> What do we know about this? What, if anything, can a network operator do to
>> help mitigate this? Or even an end user?
>
> The payload can be contained in https, so there is no way of detecting /
> stopping this at the network level. Installations need to be upgraded /
> fixed.
>
> https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/security.html
>
> 1. upgrade log4j to 2.15.0 and restart all java apps
> 2. start java with "-D log4j2.formatMsgNoLookups=true" (v2.10+ only)
> 3. start java with "LOG4J_FORMAT_MSG_NO_LOOKUPS=true" environment variable
> (v2.10+ only)
> 4. zip -q -d log4j-core-*.jar
> org/apache/logging/log4j/core/lookup/JndiLookup.class
>
> There's a lot of scanning going on at the moment, so if you have an exposed
> java instance running something which includes log4j2, you may already be
> compromised.
>
> Nick
Alternatively, this incantation solved the problem on my linux server:
rpm -e log4j12 ant-apache-log4j log4j
Owen
