With a kicking ass pitch -----Original Message----- From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+jean=ddostest...@nanog.org> On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: November 26, 2021 5:52 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: IPv6 and CDN's
On 11/3/21 22:13, Max Tulyev wrote: > Implementing IPv6 reduces costs for CGNAT. You will have (twice?) less > traffic flow through CGNAT, so cheaper hardware and less IPv4 address > space. Isn't it? How to express that in numbers CFO can take to the bank? Mark.
