On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:14 AM Jay R. Ashworth <j...@baylink.com> wrote: > I could be wrong, but I don't think expanding 1918 was the goal of these > proponents....
Hi Jay, I would be happy with the compromise where the addresses are assigned to "unicast; reserved." We can fight over exactly what unicast use they should be put to 20 years from now when ordinary equipment and software churn has rendered the addresses more or less usable. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin b...@herrin.us https://bill.herrin.us/
