I've had an IPV6 tunnel from Hurricane Electric for 10+ years I think. IPv4 will probably live as it does now in my network, mostly for management / interserver coms for legacy hardware/software that doesn't support ipv6.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 5:31 PM <b...@uu3.net> wrote: > Oh, sorry to disappoint you, but they are not missing anything.. > Internet become a consumer product where data is provided by > large corporations similary to TV now. Your avarage Joe consumer > does NOT care about NAT and that he cant run services or he does NOT > have full e2e communication. > > Yes, you are right, NAT was a second class internet for a while but > now it seems that we cannot live without it anymore :) > I dont really see other way how I can connect LAN to internet now. > Using public IPs? Thats so terrible idea. How can I be el-cheappo > dual-homed then? > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > > From: Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> > To: Andy Ringsmuth <a...@andyring.com> > Cc: Grant Taylor via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Re: 10 years from now... (was: internet futures) > Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 08:00:38 +1100 > > There are more smart phones in use in the world today the world than can > be > addressed by IPv4. Complaining about lack of IPv6 deployment has been > legitimate for a long time. Telcos shouldn˙˙t have to deploy NATs. Homes > shouldn˙˙t have to deploy NATs. Businesses shouldn˙˙t have to deploy NATs. > > NATs produce a second class Internet. We have had to lived with a second > class Internet for so long that most don˙˙t know what they are missing. -- > Mark Andrews >
