> On Mar 24, 2021, at 11:43 AM, Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/24/21 17:31, Tom Beecher wrote:
> 
>>  Real time can be helpful when needed, but when it is not, it feels to me 
>> like it becomes significant noise, and often times impossible to track what 
>> conversations are when (and when they were.).
> 
> I agree with this when it comes to messaging apps.
> 
> I made the conscious decision not to be beholden to these messaging apps. 
> I'll get to it, when I get to it.
> 
> Time is very precious; if you feel something is urgent, call. Sending me a 
> text and getting cross because I didn't reply in 60 seconds just falls on 
> deaf ears. As you say, time is our main asset.
> 
> Not to sound aloof, but unless it's time-sensitive and I happen to be on app 
> when the message comes in, I'll generally reply after a day, sometimes a 
> week. I've setup my phones not to illuminate, vibrate or chime when messages 
> or other such things come in. Phone calls being the only exception.
> 
> It has allowed me to slow down, and make better use of my limited time 
> (mostly drinking wine, but you get the idea).
> 
> Which is why, for me, replicas of a NOG on Telegram or Signal just doesn't 
> work - it's too real-time for me. I check e-mail more regularly (on my 
> laptop) than I check my phones.
> 
> Mark.
An extension of Mark’s comments could include actually using a voice call if 
there really is an immediate need — voice message recording is built-in to many 
smart phones, wireless handsets, and VoIP services. 

Reply via email to