In article <cap-gugxi6wrrpcmu9cbc-gn+qb9gvrg9pvbnp+e7dtvo66k...@mail.gmail.com> you write: >With private organizations it gets much more complicated. No >organization is compelled to publish anything. But then section 230 of >the DMCA comes in and says: if you exercise editorial control over >what's published then you are liable for any unlawful material which >is published. ...
Sigh. This is false. 100% false. It is the exact opposite of what 47 USC 230 really says. Also, it's the CDA, not the DMCA. Please see the message I sent earlier today about section 230 and the links in it to material by actual lawyers explaining what the law does and does not say and do. R's, John
