On 19/Aug/20 19:34, Clinton Work wrote: > What is the device on the other side of the MX204 100G link. We've had some > incrementing PCS errors on 100G links when the other side was a Juniper > PTX1000 using port et-0/0/25. Using a different port on the PTX1000 > resolved the incrementing PCS errors. We opened JTAC cases for two incidents > and a root cause was never found. Good to know, we are just about to start deploying a bunch of PTX1000's. Mark.
- 100g PCS Errors Nicholas Warren
- Re: 100g PCS Errors J. Hellenthal via NANOG
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Matt Harris
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Tom Beecher
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Aaron
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Clinton Work
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Mark Tinka
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Saku Ytti
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Mark Tinka