On 25/Jul/20 03:24, Randy Bush wrote: > a great path. fork lift all cpe and cgn in the core. the vendors' > dream All major vendors are shipping IPv6. Some even 464XLAT. And yet they will not put those forward as long term solutions. As Randy points out, CG-NAT sells plenty in license fees. And you need more and more, every year. Not less. So, go ahead and enrich the vendors, at the expense of your business. And we shall all wonder why they keep saying "But no one is asking for IPv6". Mark.
- Re: MAP-T in production Brandon Martin
- Re: MAP-T in production JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: MAP-T in production Brandon Martin
- Re: MAP-T in production Ca By
- Re: MAP-T in production Tom Hill
- Re: MAP-T in production Brian Johnson
- Re: MAP-T in production Randy Bush
- Re: MAP-T in production Brian Johnson
- Re: MAP-T in production Brandon Martin
- Re: MAP-T in production Randy Bush
- Re: MAP-T in production Mark Tinka
- Re: MAP-T in production Brian Johnson
- Re: MAP-T in production Baldur Norddahl