On 22/07/2020 22:15, Brian Johnson wrote: > Has anyone implemented a MAP-T solution in production? I am looking > for feedback on this as a deployment strategy for an IPv6 only core > design. My concern is MAP-T CE stability and overhead on the network. > The BR will have to do overloaded NAT anyway to access IPv4 only > resources. The idea being that when IPv4 is no longer needed, this > will be a quicker “clean-up” project than a dual-stack solution.
Richard Patterson did a talk about Sky Italia's 'greenfield' build at UKNOF45, earlier this year: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Cg3dLR95wY Lots of interesting stuff in there, but the pertinent broadband termination parts - which go on to mentioning MAP-T - start at ~15:00. Regards, -- Tom
